Yep, clear ideas with code and tests have a lot more chance of making 1.0. Post 1.0 we should look at more wide ranging changes.
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:05:53 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In principle this could be interesting... how about being somewhat more > precise. Do pay attention that we're heading towards 1.0 so that such > changes have little chances to come into the tree soon, at least as I > understand. > > paul > > Le 17 sept. 04, � 10:15, Guido Anzuoni a �crit : > > > > > Hello, > > first of all I have to say that Jelly is really great ! > > > > I would suggest some refactoring about script management in > > JellyContext in order to allow pluggable strategies for, as an > > example, caching of compiled scripts and/or caching of templates. > > I think that it would be better if context management (i.e. variable > > resolution), script source management (i.e. templates reading) and > > script compilation are clearly separated concepts. > > > > Guido. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
