Ok, I've solved it using : http://jroller.com/page/JonathanLehr/20040808#beanutls_1_7_0_released
periods in property names are frequent, since I'm using validator to validade property files. thanks Ricardo -----Mensagem original----- De: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: terca-feira, 21 de Setembro de 2004 14:10 Para: Jakarta Commons Users List Assunto: RE: [Validator] trouble using validator standalone By "key" I think you mean property name. I don't know of any way to avoid the nested evaluation caused by a "." character. Why do you want a period in a property name? David --- Ricardo Trindade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm now using validator successfully. > > However, one question remains. I'm using it to validate properties > inside > Property objects. It works fine, provided that the key doesn't contain > the > "." character. If it does, validator tries to validate a "composite" > property. Is there any way to overcome this ? > > thanks > Ricardo > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviada: segunda-feira, 20 de Setembro de 2004 21:59 > Para: Jakarta Commons Users List > Assunto: RE: [Validator] trouble using validator standalone > > > Ok, I think I'll be able to use it now. > > Removing the wrapping appears to make sense...It makes reusing > validators > harder than it should be... > > thanks > Ricardo > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviada: segunda-feira, 20 de Setembro de 2004 20:38 > Para: Jakarta Commons Users List > Assunto: Re: [Validator] trouble using validator standalone > > > Validator comes with 2 primary features: A pluggable validation > framework > and basic validation methods that you can choose to use in the > framework. > GenericValidator is the second feature. > > Currently, you need to wrap the provided validation methods with a > method > that is invoked by the framework. Struts' FieldChecks class wraps > GenericValidator methods for its usage and the example standalone > validator class also wraps some methods. You need to do something > similar > if you're using validator without Struts. > > The wrapping requirement is a leftover from the old design and there has > been talk of removing that step altogether by making versions of > GenericValidator methods that are directly callable from the framework. > > David > > --- Ricardo Trindade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I' having troubles using commons-validator (latest release, also > tried > > today's snapshot) without struts. > > > > Specifically I tried the code in CVS that can be reached through the > > FAQ > > item : > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/ValidatorStandalone > > > > I couldn't understand why this examples uses Validators from the test > > package, instead of using, for example, GenericValidator. I tried to > > change > > the example to use GenericValidator, but validating my bean always > > fails. > > > > My XML (header removed): > > > > <form-validation> > > <global> > > <validator name="inteiros" > > classname="org.apache.commons.validator.GenericValidator" > method="isInt" > > methodParams="java.lang.String" msg="errors.int"/> > > </global> > > <formset> > > <form name="ValidateBean"> > > <field property="firstName" depends="inteiros"/> > > </form> > > </formset> > > </form-validation> > > > > > > thanks > > Ricardo Trindade > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
