Two more proposals then:
- Jelly: scripts in XML
(scripts are a form of configuration... I like the naming)
- Jelly: mouldable XML
In the latter I think I should be able to get a few pictures out of
moudling jell-o with my kids... this may be "modern transluscent"...
I suggest we do not consider to change the jelly name, just the
sub-title and maybe the overall graphical/marketing/word-choice
appearance.
paul
Le 23 mai 05, � 03:36, Paul DeCoursey a �crit :
I like the Jelly name as well. I use it for all kinds of things,
mostly scripting. I can't say I have ever used it for configuration.
As far as any sort of name change, I don't think it a good idea. It
may need better marketing, but does that even fit into the open source
world?
Paul
On May 21, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Hans Gilde wrote:
My 2 cents: I got into Jelly as a framework for building Swing GUIs.
In this
case, the Tag model works very well and the ability to implement the
scripting is also extremely useful.
Unfortunately, the company I did it for laid me off and I have to
start the
whole framework from scratch if I want to publish it open source.
However, I
find Jelly to be rather more than configuration... the name Jelly
really
seems to fit for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
