I've been using Digester 1.7 for several days now and it all seems good.
I have only one small complaint. Actually, it isn't even new to 1.7:
addCallMethod(pattern, method, 0);
and
<call-method-rule methodname="method" paramcount="0" />
behave in, perhaps, an unexpected manner. The problem is compounded by
the fact that, in both cases, if you have, naively, defined a method on
the object on top of the stack with the signature:
public void method()
you will get an error message that says:
No such accessible method: method() on object: <tos>
Pretty confusing.
I think the plausible solution is a quick note in the commons-digester
FAQ that explains the semantics of:
addCallMethod(pattern, method, 0);
vs.
addCallMethod(pattern, method);
Just Sayin'
Blake Meike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
