Hi Dion
Very nice to answer
Dion Gillard wrote:
On 6/24/05, A Leg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I am using jelly for our project :
http://compiere-mfgscm.sourceforge.net/
We made a plugin layer similar to maven plugins layer.
Our plugins are working good. We currently use them from Jini services
and it is quite nice.
Our question is must we move to marmalade ?
Why would you?
If jelly was not supported on long term.
To answer this we would like to know :
Will jelly be supported on long term ?
Yes. There are many of us using it outside of Maven. The original
author abandoned it a long time ago, and it still moves on.
So I will keep it using jelly which is working good for what we are doing.
Why maven made the move ?
Talk to the maven2 team.
I asked the question and the answer has been :
If you don't like change, I'm afraid you're in the wrong industry.
Wow !!!!!!!!!
I personaly feel that all hat moves : ant to maven, cvs to subversion,
jelly to marmalade where people create news peojects instead of
contributing to improve existing one, all these moves are not a big
advantage for open source.
Already my ISP does not support Linux because instead of having one good
linuxconf they have many "proprietary" configuration tools.
Thanks for any answers to my questions
Andre
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre
