Sorry it took a little while to notice this email. James wrote both the Jakarta Commons sandbox and then Codehaus versions of Messenger. The Codehaus one is the more recently active, but I'm unsure how much it differs from the one in Commons.
As he was the only developer on Messenger, the one in Commons is effectively deprecated in favour of the Codehaus project. We need to come up with a dormancy process for the sandbox to make this more clear. Hen On 7/22/05, Jose Antonio Perez Testa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bub, > We use Messenger in several production systems for 3 years ago. > At the beginning we used OpenJMS as provider and now SonicMQ. > The systems delivers a high traffic level and we have experienced some > problems with the Sonic provider only. > The main problem is about connections unreleased and a high number of > Session per connection causing the server to degrade and crash. > We are now in a process of determining the failure point, but I bet it > is Sonic MQ server problem. > > Anyway I recommend you using it! > > Regards, > Testa > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, Has Messenger been abandoned? I can't seem to get the source - couldn't > > get at CVS. I realize that it is only a sandbox project. Also, CodeHaus > > also has a project named Messenger also contributed to by James Strachan. > > Seems like a useful project. Is anyone using it? Can anyone recommend it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bub > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
