On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:34 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny from the > > commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be rolled > > anyway. > > > > i'm just rolling the cuts for dion so i'd appreciate some guidance on > > this from those who know the code better. opinions? > > >From looking at the patch > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35881 > this is a fairly significant change to the email API. > > I think this is definitely something that should be done by the main > product maintainer, not someone just volunteering to roll RCs.
+1 > I would suggest that either 1.0 go out without this change, or 1.0 be > delayed until the real email maintainer(s) have properly investigated > this, considered any backwards compatibility issues, etc. i'm willing to let this one ride for a little while, i think. the release candidate's only just out so there's no real reason why a decision needs to be taken just yet. > And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then > perhaps 34056 should be as well. +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
