Quoting Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jacob Kjome wrote: > > It looks like the only special characters allowed in the scheme are > > '+', '-', and '.'. I guess that means my proposed "res*:" protocol is > > out. Is there a reason that only the said special characters are > > allowed and not others? Would '*' be ok to add to that list? Or is > > there a URL standard that you are following here that limits the > > characters to what has already been specified? If '*' isn't allowed, > > would it be ok to use "res+:"? > What if we simply name it "classpath:"? > > So "res:" uses the default JVM rules and "classpath:" scans the whole > classpath. >
That probably makes sense. I'll try to look into this tonight. Jake > > --- > Mario > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
