On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 07:12 -0700, Kirill Grouchnikov wrote: > > IMO your project would be far more effective if it didn't > > suffer so much > > from being obviously just one man's opinions. setting > > yourself up as a > > expert without taking great care to ensure that you > > understand the > > subject and that your criticisms are accurate is to > > invite attacks on > > your personal integrity. > > Another thing - the last answer in the FAQ [1] would be the > best answer to the poorly-disguised personal attack above.
it wasn't intended to be a personal attack. as i said off-list, i decide to give you the benefit of the doubt though others may not. if you really want to achieve the gaols you state, then i'd recommend that you adopt a more positive attitude. > Suffices to say that developers of a number of other > libraries have taken a different approach - seeing the > assessment as a chance of learning from their potential > users instead of looking down on them from high above. you've picked up a few things missing from the documentation. thanks for that. i had hoped that in return i might help to open your mind a little to other approaches to data binding. there is a real lack of knowledge out there about which general approaches are most appropriate to which problems. i had hoped that you might be able to step up and but that will mean casting aside the advocacy but maybe i've just been wasting my time... - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
