You're welcome. And thanks for your reply; it's always nice to hear when
a suggestion worked out.

Cheers,

Simon

On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:58 -0800, Dmitry Beransky wrote:
> Thanks, Simon
> 
> Using CallMethodRule worked.  I did trying using it before posting my 
> question, but somehow I couldn't get it to work on the first try.
> 
> At 02:48 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
> >The CallMethodRule variant that takes an explicit list of parameter
> >types can then be used to set the problem property.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to