I would like to help to code betwixt support. The approach I mentioned
seemed to me to a step in that direction. If you have another approach in
mind I would be glad to hear it. Please let me know what you have in mind,
and I will look into it.
-Guillermo
From: robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <[email protected]>
To: Jakarta Commons Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Can Betwixt/Digester directly access public data
membersw/ogetters/setters?
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:25:01 +0000
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 20:56 +0000, Guillermo Bares wrote:
> I am definitely interested in adding support for fields. If you have
ideas
> of what the best way to go about it would be, I would greatly appreciate
it.
> T. Dudziak previously Thomas Dudziak that the SetPropertiesRule would
be a
> good place to start. While going through the source code I noticed that
the
> SetPropertiesRule uses the BeanUtils' populate method to do the update.
> Would you see the field access using a similar/identical approach?
if you want to give the digester rules a try, then yep.
(let me know if you want help code betwixt support)
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
