> > > Von: "Shai Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Generally, I understand what you're saying. > > > However, I still don't understand why commons-logging can't supply an > > > indication on whether it detected a logging implementation or not. This > > > indication should not be platform dependant, but it should be managed by > > > the commons-logging layer only.
By the way, just in case you didn't realise it these messages: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (Logger_Name). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. are output by log4j, NOT by commons-logging. Commons-logging successfully found the log4j installation, successfully created an org.apache.log4j.Logger object and successfully called the debug(msg) method (or whatever) on it. Log4j then detected that this was the first call to it, tried to find its config, couldn't find it so printed the message. As far as commons-logging is concerned, everything went fine. All log4j calls it made succeeded. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
