Hi Simon, > Most of those problems never existed. That page is just wrong in many > places.
This is -erm- weird. The information seems to be quit reasonable, is it just a try from the log4j author to prevent people from using commons-logging? -- Best regards, Christian mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
