I was thinking the same thing. If you spend any time with jmimemagic, you find that the API is a little weak. If you pass in a file, the library goes incredibly slow, because for each file matcher, it creates a new RandomAccessFile object. Also, there is no support for ByteBuffer.
I have fixed these 2 problems in the jmimemagic that I am using.... On 4/17/06, Markus Härnvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark wrote: > > I like jmimemagic as well. Does anyone know if the project is still > > being maintained? I have posted a message on the jmimemagic forum and > > never got a response. There are a couple things that need to be done > > I think to make jmimemagic better. > > > > We started a similar project a while back. The idea was to use the BSD > file(1) database as it is from Java. > > It's be better to use a simpler format as jmimemagic has done. The Unix > magic file is not that nice. > > If the author can be convinced to change the license to APL I think it > is a really good candidate for commons-something. > > /Markus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
