-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hopefully they'll respond - that would definitely be the best route if possible.
During SF's recent CVS outage, I was informed (by another project's developer who has worked with both) that their SVN setup was much easier to deal with. Brian Henri Yandell wrote: > Definitely - you can always redistribute LGPL/GPL with or without your > changes, provided you adhere by the licence (which basically means > provide the source). > > Always best to try and work with the original project of course - > provided the original author is still reading email and they didn't > host the project on a personal site (making it hard for you to do the > same). > > That's one advantage of tigris/savannah/apache/sourceforge. Others can > pick it up - shame Sourceforge is so damn slow :) Anyone tried out > their SVN yet? > > Hen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFERTjWaCoPKRow/gARAkrZAJ4o0eBfc9YIP5LrwwzTN7ukodEi3wCfTIJA cyGJG1m0C5ZjUGFmGnpA+SU= =i32A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
