Possible, yes. Assignment in Jexl 1.0 is legal, parsed successfully, but does nothing.
On 4/19/06, Hans Gilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JSP has multiple ways to do variable assignment (similar to using tags > versus Jexl) and people seem to handle picking the right one. > > Would it be possible, though, to break some existing code that > accidentally > has an assignment that is not currently processed? From a couple of tests, > it doesn't seem to me that this would be a problem. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:55 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ? > > I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these > features available. > Loops shouldn't be a poblem. > > As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as > a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to > folks who clear the context variable of the context. > Does anyone do so ? > > paul > > > Dion Gillard wrote: > > There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not > > want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while > > statements etc. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
