Sure I just added Bug 39367 ... Thanks --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/20/06, Nestor Urquiza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I put the example in my last response to Faish and > of > > course if having the getter > > SCXMLExecutor#getRootContext() can be avoided for > my > > use case I rather do it. > > > > I am using a propietary kind of servlet container > and > > the way context is managed is with a simple Map > but I > > would really like to have my code at "bridge" > level > > not dependant on this particular servlet > > implementation. I can even put the rootCtx in the > > context as I am doing with my exec in the "system" > > (also called most recently "domain" by you) layer > > because the main problem of course is that it is > not > > enough to have the exec object if I want to > manipulate > > the root context. > > > > So given those facts do you have an alternative > for my > > usecase other than making available > > SCXMLExecutor#getRootContext()? > <snip/> > > Ah, proprietary stuff ;-) You could provide a root > context that was a > JexlContext instantiated using the Map argument > constructor, that way > whatever is in the "simple Map" above is in the > Context. The only > difference in moving to another container would > probably be how that > Map is obtained, maybe that is significant enough > for making this > addition. > > Can you file a report in bugzilla [1] with some > details on how the > getter helps interoperability for your usage? I know > its a small > change, but we should have better archival for why > someone would like > to set vars on the root context (rather than setting > them in the > "environment" itself) before making the change, IMO. > > -Rahul > > [1] > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/issue-tracking.html > > > > Thanks! > > > <snap/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
