We will be publishing the schema as a URL when we reach last call working draft, but we don't know when that's going to be. We're planning to release another working draft this summer, but haven't made any firm plans beyond that.
- Jim -----Original Message----- From: Nestor Urquiza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:10 PM To: Barnett, James Cc: Jakarta Commons Users List Subject: RE: [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node Thanks Jim, That was exactly my assumption while we were discussing the commons-scxml implementation in java for the scxml draft. Just a question about the schema. When do you think it will be published in a w3c url? Recently I have notice that urls that were working before are no longer working like the one that specified the DTD for XSLT "http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; Thanks a lot for your help, Nestor --- "Barnett, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The current version of the spec uses the attribute > 'location' to > generalize > the concept of 'name'. The idea is that a location > is designated by > some sort of path expression, and a simple variable > can be viewed > as a degenerate path consisting of only one link. > So to assign to a > variable named 'foo', write <assign location="foo" > ...>. > > However, we warn that the datamodel is the least > stable part of the > specification and may change significantly in future > drafts. > > - Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Nestor Urquiza > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node > > > Hello guys, > I have noticed the scxml schema is not accepting > @name > as a valid attribute within the <assign> node. > > The current schema is just concentrating in the > datamodel part forgetting about the fact that > <assign> > node can be used to just modify a local variable and > then @name is a valid attribute as well. > > Am I missing something? Thanks a lot!, > > Nestor > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
