A better subject ... On 8/30/06, Nestor Urquiza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Rahul, Could you point me to the WIKI section where I could post my comments?
<snip/>
You could do a couple of things: * Add a "Related Links" section on the homepage [1], if you want to just post the permlink * Add a new page (whatever name makes sense, use the '/' to get it nested under SCXML) if you want to add any commentary, and link it from the homepage [1]. Don't worry about getting it wrong, we can (almost) always make it right ;-)
Should I just post the link to my blog or just use it while talking more about the particular usecase/use of scxml-commons? This is as I posted in the blog: 1) To build a "State Oriented Business Protocol" 2) To build a "Complete MVC Framework" for which the Model and the View can be any technology you like.
<snap/> Its upto you, though it'd be great if you could post the link even if you do more. As a general guideline, as long as it has to do with Commons SCXML and its usage, it can go on that wiki. -Rahul
regards, Nestor --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/30/06, Nestor Urquiza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > About this I posted something related in my > blog[1] > > after I found a link[2] in one of your recently > posts > > about some interesting efforts from w3c. Any > > comments/critics are welcome of course!, > > > <snip/> > > Thats a nice summary of the value proposition here. > Now if only you > can provide us with a permlink on the wiki, it will > save us a lot of > typing down the road by just being able to point to > it at will ;-) > > -Rahul > > > > Thanks, > > Nestor > > > <snap/>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
