Am testing now and will commit soon. paul
Dion Gillard wrote:
Yep, we should change Jelly to use 1.1 of JEXL now. On 9/21/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 9/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris, > > as with normal snapshot dependencies... you're expected to build or > download it. > It's a checkout aside. > <snip/>Why snapshot and not 1.1? (though we might need a rsync request before you can).-Rahul > paul > > Chris Kramp wrote: > > Hi, > >> > I'm trying to build the Jelly project source snapshot for 9/18/2006. I> > get the following output: > > > > Attempting to download commons-jexl-SNAPSHOT.jar. > > WARNING: Failed to download commons-jexl-SNAPSHOT.jar. > > Attempting to download dom4j-1.6.1.jar. > > 306K downloaded > > Attempting to download jaxen-1.1-beta-8.jar. > > 226K downloaded > > The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied > > dependency: > > > > commons-jexl-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > > > > Can anyone tell me how to get commons-jexl-SNAPSHOT.jar? > > > > Thx, > > > > Chris Kramp > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
