On 9/21/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/20/06, Rhys D Ulerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As of the most recent nightly build, it looks like the SCXML.XMLNS field
> is incorrect. It contains "http://www.w3.org/2005/07/SCXML"; which differs
> from the w3c draft recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#N10C14).
>
<snip/>
I seem to remember cut-n-pasting it from an example in an early draft,
but there clearly is a discrepancy. I'm not sure if the namespace URI
will change when SCXML goes candidate rec, but in the interest of
making such a change only once, we might want to wait and see if it
changes or not (or we could ask now).
<snip/>
Having looked at the code, this discrepancy was limited to the
SCXML.XMLNS property (and had the correct value in other places) so it
was worth fixing immediately -- should be fixed in the next nightly.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
