I'd happily go with an email2 On 10/4/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we set as requirement compatibility to the previous email tag-lib or should we just do this an email2 tag-lib ? Considering our forces, I'd target email2.Mark, for the ASF to accept your contribution, we need a signed CLA, see http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas Tell us how acceptable this is. paul Dion Gillard wrote: > It'd be interesting to see how well this would integrate in with the > existing mail stuff. > > On 9/27/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As promised, some example jelly. Putting multipart=true is a terrible >> hack >> but I couldn't think of a way to tell if the mail:mail tag contained any >> parts at the time. >> And I can't do multiple to or from, as I didn't need it at the time of >> writing either. >> >> <!-- connect to the smtp server --> >> >> <mail:setServer type="smtp" server="mailserver.notreal.com" port="25" /> >> >> <!-- to send a simple, text mail --> >> >> <mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> subject="example simple mail"> >> This is just a text mail. >> </mail:mail> >> >> <!-- send a multi-part mail --> >> >> <mail:mail to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> subject="example simple mail" multipart="true"> >> <mail:part type="html" encoding="utf-8"> >> <h1>This an html mail.</h1> >> </mail:part> >> <mail:part type="plain"> >> This is the plain text part. >> </mail:part> >> <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-a-file.png" /> >> <mail:part type="image/png" file="path-to-another-file.png" /> >> </mail:mail> >> >> <!-- get mails from a pop server --> >> >> <mail:setServer type="POP" server="pop.fake.com" userName="user" >> password="********" /> >> >> <mail:getMessages var="messages" folder="inbox" /> >> <core:forEach items="${messages}" var="message"> >> <!-- do something to the mails --> >> </core:forEach> >> >> >> >> >> On 9/26/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hmmm, same dependencies I'm afraid. I'll sort out some example jelly >> > later on. >> > >> > Mark >> > >> > >> > On 9/26/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > What are the dependencies ? I know that the javamail (and >> activation) >> > > dependencies of commons-jelly-email have been a problem to many. >> > > If you can minimize this, it would be interesting. >> > > Can you also send an example jelly snippet ? >> > > >> > > paul >> > > >> > > >> > > Mark Tombs wrote: >> > > > Its completely new. I wrote it for my own use, for sending >> multi-part >> > > > mails >> > > > with both plain text and html parts. Its still work in >> progress, but I >> > > > thought you might be interested. >> > > > >> > > > On 9/26/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Mark, >> > > >> >> > > >> is this an extension of the existing email taglib? Or >> something new? >> > > >> >> > > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/libs/email/ >> > > >> >> > > >> On 9/25/06, Mark Tombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > Hi >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I've written some jelly tags for creating emails that can send >> > > >> multi-part >> > > >> > mails, including html and attachments. I've also started >> writing >> > > some >> > > >> tags >> > > >> > that can read mail too. Is this of any interest to the >> jelly team? >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On another note, I haven't noticed a lot of development of >> jelly >> > > >> recently, and >> > > >> > the ant and maven builds are getting out of date... is the >> project >> > > >> active at >> > > >> > the moment? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > thanks >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Mark >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Rule of Acquisition #91: Hear all, trust nothing. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
