Are you using version 1.2? This test passes for me in
HEAD, so if you are using the release, it's probably a
bug that has been fixed in the interim. Be on the
lookout for a new release in the next month or two; of
course you can use HEAD yourself as well.
HTH,
Matt
--- Tim Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone see this problem before?
> The test code is this:
>
> <pre>
> public void testXPath()
> {
> List main = new ArrayList();
> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
> main.add(list);
>
> Map map1 = new HashMap();
> map1.put("a", "TEST1");
> map1.put("b", "TEST2");
> main.add(map1);
>
> JXPathContext context =
> JXPathContext.newContext(main); // passed when
> replace main with map1
> context.setLenient(true);
>
> assertEquals("value is not right", "TEST1",
> context.getValue("//a"));
> assertEquals("value is not right", "TEST2",
> context.getValue("//b"));
> assertEquals("value is not right", null,
> context.getValue("//c"));
> }
>
> </pre>
>
> This test run will throw StackOverflowError with
>
org.apache.common.jxpath.model.beans.CollectionPointer(CollectionPointer.java):202
>
>
> In reality, main is my bean with HashMap attributes
> that can contain other attributes. When using JXPath
> to provide a uniform way to access my bean
> attributes, I stumple on this problem.
> getValue("//not-exist") didn't return null as
> expected but go into a loop that consumes all
> memory.
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
