> On 16 Sep 2016, at 19:54, Mark Elkins <m...@posix.co.za> wrote:
> I've taken a look at the suggested outcome (The proposed amendments) and
> generally I believe the suggested amendments to be very
> acceptable. Thank you for taking the time and doing this Alan.
> My only disappointment is the outcome regarding the non-voting status of
> Associate Members, whom I strongly feel should be allowed to vote (in a
> similar manner as resource members) from their first anniversary onwards.

Yes, some people do want Associate Members to be allowed to vote, possibly 
after a time delay.  However, my sense of the overall discussion is that most 
people think that (a) Associate members should not vote, and (b) the Bylaws 
already say that they cannot vote, elthough the wording may be confusing.

In this round, I want to propose changes that both improve AFRINIC’s 
accountability, and have a high probablility of passing the 75% majority vote, 
so I am proposing to clarify the wording around what most people already think 
is the case that Associate Members cannot vote.

Alan Barrett

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Community-Discuss mailing list

Reply via email to