> On 19 Sep 2016, at 13:08, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Alan,
> One point I observed has not been captured in the summary (which i also
> suggested), was to limit the Independent Director seat to "at most" one per
> region at any given time. This will address a possible situation where we end
> up having 4 directors from a region.
I don’t think that’s an accountability issue. Even in the unlikely event that
there are four from the same sub-region (regional director, two non-regional
directors, and CEO), and that the four conspire together to advance some sort
of sub-regional interest that’s against AFRINIC’s interest, the four would
still not form a majority of the Board.
Instead of legislating geographical diversity in the Bylaws, I would prefer to
rely on the membership to consider all kinds of diversity when voting.
Remember that Bylaws changes need a 75% majority. Would adding geographical
restrictions to the non-geographical seats have enough support to pass?
Community-Discuss mailing list