> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:09, Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> > wrote: > > I am also far from convinced that the limitation on proxies would stand up to > legal scrutiny and I would like to hear informed legal opinion on this. > > The fifth schedule of the companies act – clause 6, makes specific references > to proxies – and is explicit that any member may appoint anyone as a proxy.
What the Mauritius Companies Act refers to as Members corresponds to what the AFRINIC Bylaws refer to as Registered Members. > It also has a very specific clause in the companies act that states that the > entirety of clause 6 applies “not withstanding any provision in any > constitution adopted by the company.” The only exception to this is clause 6 > (d)(v) which makes reference to the format of the actual proxy. > > My reading of this – and again, I would like to hear informed legal opinion, > is that limitations on the proxy instruments that could impact on anyone > appointing a proxy of their choice would be out of line with the companies > act – and hence the limitation in our bylaws is illegal and cannot be > enforced – since it is overridden by the act – which reigns supreme. > > Can any lawyers on this list please comment on the above? I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that the Companies Act may override the Bylaws on matters relating to Directors and Registered Members, but not on matters relating to Resource Members (which is an AFRINIC construct that is not reflected in the Companies Act). Alan Barrett _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
