I would recommend amending this to require that participants have an email address.
It seems to me that useful participation in the PDP by stakeholders is better defined in this way in that if you have a stake in the internet, it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which you wouldn’t be able to obtain at least one email address at a sufficiently low burden. Further, I think that lacking an email address means an inability to participate in the PDWG mailing list. As such, I think it would preclude informed participation in the process. Owen > On Nov 2, 2016, at 13:33 , abel ELITCHA <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > Comments inline. > > Le 1 nov. 2016 19:34, "Andrew Alston" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > > > Arnaud, > > > > > > You are right – proxies aren’t allowed at PDP – except in this case, they > > are not proxies. I am the direct administrative contact for those > > organisations and hence I speak for each of them, one organisation at a > > time. > > > > Participation in PDP discussions is by individual and not by organization. > Hence the direct administrative contact role you have for organizations would > be irrelevant in the policy discussions. > > Section 3.2.1 of the PDP says: > > =================== > > Openness > > All policies are developed in an open forum in which anyone may participate. > There are no qualifications for participation. > > =================== > > *Co-chairs should correct me if I'm wrong*. > > > > Merci. > > --Abel > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
