Hi @Willy, that's great information. +100 @Stephen.
2016-12-03 15:49 GMT+01:00 Stephen Honlue <[email protected]>: > Hi @Willy, > > That is good, I hope others will follow, firstly the Universities as you > said, consider talking to them individually(we can make a plan), to my > knowledge, all of them are connected via Camtel, and some are even > tunneling. > > Camtel should also strategise to push v6 to customers, because most of > these clients do not care, they just want Facebook to be accessible. > > Again, good work, and I think, @AFRINICtraning should give priority to > those not having v6 yet, so as to get them on board :) > > Regards, > > On 03/12/2016 14:39, Willy MANGA wrote: > > Hi, > > speaking from an end-user perspective :) > > Some months ago on afripv6-discuss [1] I was talking about our small > network reachable through v6 tunnel while waiting our ISP (CAMTEL, > AS15964) terminate v6 routing. > > Since 3 days, we are able to communicate with the internet using native > v6 address. > If they configure the reverse DNS, I will be more than happy to give > native v6 address to our main servers (especially the smtp server). > Some users network are working through dual-stack. It works fine. > I also request v6 routing on one another site in Cameroon. > > In order to achieve that (in my context at least) : self commitment, lot > of advocacy at various stage,level and most important being able to play > with your wallet (IF YOUR ISP CONSIDERS YOU AS A GOOD CUSTOMER) :"You > don't activate, we don't pay; even worse we will move on". > It's been 10 years since CAMTEL has been allocated v6 prefix. I may be > wrong but it was not really use since that period. We constrain them to > deploy it and they make it happen. > > While doing that I hope more netadministrators (ESPECIALLY IN > UNIVERSITIES) will request v6 too in my country. > When you ask to some people,entities (in Cameroon): «why don't you > deploy v6 on your network ?»; the answer is : either «it's up to $ISP to > deploy first, then I will follow» or «I do not see the needs; Why do I > need to let people use globally routable address ?» > No one want to start with at least a concrete transition plan. > > Frankly speaking, I can't talk for the professionnal area but > universities have *no excuses* to not use IPv6 at all. Courses, > researchs related to internet protocol should be based on v6 . Thus it > will help if network are running on v6. > > At last, we should repeat it everytime : "stop (or at least reduce) > using NAT". Period. > > > P.S : by the way I hope that for 2017, training team will give > priorities to local hosts who are using v6 (even through tunnel) ;) > > 1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/afripv6-discuss/2016/002047.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing > [email protected]https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > > -- > -- > MSH > Trainer > t: +230 403 51 00 |f: +230 466 6758 <+230%20466%206758> |tt: @afrinic > |w:www.afrinic.netfacebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | > youtube.com/afrinicmedia > ___________________________ > AFRINIC-25 in Mauritius from 28 to 30 Nov 2016 (Free Training 25 to 27 Nov) > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > -- *Patrick KOUOBOU* *IT Manager * *Ingenieur MIAGE* Senior System and Network Administrator *CCNA, LPIC-2, MCITP, MTCNA, MTCWE* *www.cisformation.com <http://www.cisformation.com>* *(+237) 676760710* *(+237) 694339330*
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
