Thank you very much Alain for all this clarification.
It is important that the legal status are respected.

The community needs to be attentive to that.

Regards,
Ramanou

2018-04-25 18:01 GMT+00:00 Noah <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:21 AM, ALAIN AINA <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Community,
>>
>> Recent developments at AFRINIC involving board chair and staff has
>> raised  general indignation in this community which as individuals, stood
>> up to condemn and asked for the appropriate actions and measures be taken.
>> As expected, we saw resistance and interpretation of laws, morals and
>> behaviours. A resolution was proposed  to demand vote of no confidence on
>> the whole board as board was seen as reluctant to invoke article 14.1(III)
>> of the bylaws, which is the only mechanism to remove a board member.
>>
>> Since then, former chair has resigned from the board, and folks think it
>> was time to turn the page of the resolution and focus on the issues raised
>> by the board and staff incident:
>> - investigate and clarify responsibilities,
>> -  take actions against wrongdoers,
>> - take actions in favour of the victims,
>> - review board and management governance and practices to prevent this in
>> the future and
>> - restore  good work ambiance at AFRINIC
>>
>> Apparently this view was not shared by all. Some still want  the vote of
>> no confidence and the board decision to not include the point on the
>> agenda  for the AGMM, invoking  article 12.14(IX), created another
>> turbulence in the air.
>>
>> Why should  we be selective in the application  of the bylaws or the
>> company act ? is it not our  collective responsibility to respect and
>> follow the bylaws which governs our operations? how long will it take for
>> us to learn that laws and regulations apply to all and we shall constantly
>> seek the best for the community and the organisation and not favour our
>> personal and direct interests ?
>>
>> Have we forgotten that  bottom-up and community-driven were recently
>> always challenged and opposed to Bylaws and company act ?
>>
>> Before Tunis 2015 and following the Tunis incident, part of this
>> community has been asking for a complete review of AFRINIC accountability
>> after several years of operations and to adapt to  new developments and
>> comply to current best practices. A major request is  to review AFRINIC
>> legal status and  give power and mechanisms to members to recall board
>> members.
>>
>> AFRINIC accountability review : A long way, a structural problem to solve
>>
>> Late 2015 board engaged in an accountability review…  a public summary of
>> the review results  was published in may 2016.
>> https://www.afrinic.net/images/AFRINICRIRAccountabilityAsses
>> sment-PublicSummary-20160518.pdf
>>
>>
>> In June 2016,  some propositions( in 12 points)  of amendments to the
>> bylaws based on the review  were  submitted to the community for
>> discussions by the board.  https://lists.afrinic.net/pipe
>> rmail/community-discuss/attachments/20160610/86196c1f/attachment.pdf
>>
>> As  one can see, the point of giving power and mechanisms to members to
>> recall board members was not taken into account.
>>
>> After some long but interesting discussions, other points including the
>> recall of board members were added, making the total of proposed changes to
>> 17 from  the 12 originally proposed by board.
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attach
>> ments/20161104/cc58b033/attachment.pdf
>>
>> All suggestions for a consensual amendment of the bylaws as a whole were
>> ignored  in favour of voting on 17  independent resolutions.
>> Unsurprisingly  the results  are what we got. The resolution on board
>> member recall was also rejected as was seen to target specific board
>> members.
>>
>> Afterwards, the community was told that the GC will be formed and one of
>> its 1st priority will be another accountability review with focus on
>> community requests which did not pass. Nothing has pop up since.
>>
>> We have seen enough developments to  convince all  that the new
>> accountability review is a must. Let create a favorable environment for it
>> and the required amendments to proceedings implemented as soon as possible.
>>
>
>
> I must say, you have broken down the issues in a very chronological manner
> and i couldn't agree more.
>
>
>
>> In the meantime, let us refocus. I call upon the board to show a clear
>> plan for the  accountability review as well as for the reviews  and actions
>> required  from the recent  board-staff incident.
>>
>
> +1 to this and I also look forward to the anticipated report on the
> board-staff matter as 30th April is around the corner.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> ===
>> Board web page can tell those  were serving when this review and bylaws
>> changes were conducted, same as  list archives available to tell how
>> things went or were managed.
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps
>>
>> —Alain
>>
>>
> Noah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>


-- 

*--BIAOU Ramanou**--*
--www.biaou.net--
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to