@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic?
Any comment on
https://bgp.he.net/AS35916#_prefixes
They are announced in USA via Multacom

-- 
 Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: 
 https://tutanota.com


Dec 20, 2020, 14:00 by [email protected]:

> Send Community-Discuss mailing list submissions to
>  [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>  https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>  [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>  [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Community-Discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>  1. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources
>  (Noah)
>  2. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of    IPv4 resources
>  ([email protected])
>  3. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of    IPv4 resources
>  (Ronald F. Guilmette)
>  4. Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb,  Inc. and Fiber Grid,
>  Inc. (Ronald F. Guilmette)
>  5. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources
>  (AFRINIC Communication)
>  6. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources
>  (yamadu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:04:22 +0300
> From: Noah <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <[email protected]>,
>  Afnog <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the
>  misappropriation of IPv4 resources
> Message-ID:
>  <CAEqgTWbeKYuBoS-hKD19PiM13mZNP-YnyShAPH=ef9q9ns0...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in
>> discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at
>> higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything.
>>
> Thomas,
>
> Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal
> which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role
> for AFRINIC with:
>
>  ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies
>  ? No need based justification
>  ? No checking of valid  ? right to use? and no dispute.
>  ? The list is endless
>
> The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors
> and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best
> interests of the AFRICAN region.
>
>> my 2 cents
>>
> You are spot on.
>
> Cheers,
> Noah
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20201219/f0a56a75/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:38:06 +0100
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To: Noah <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <[email protected]>,
>  Afnog <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the
>  misappropriation of  IPv4 resources
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2020, at 18:09, Noah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in 
>>> discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at 
>>> higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything.
>>>
> No wonder the urgency in getting the policy ratified ......! 
>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal 
>> which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role 
>> for AFRINIC with:
>>
>>  ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies
>>  ? No need based justification 
>>  ? No checking of valid  ? right to use? and no dispute.
>>  ? The list is endless 
>>
>> The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors 
>> and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best 
>> interests of the AFRICAN region.
>>
>>> my 2 cents
>>>
>>
>> You are spot on.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Noah
>> _______________________________________________
>> afnog mailing list
>> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20201219/ce51cefd/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:20:59 -0800
> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <[email protected]>
> To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <[email protected]>,
>  [email protected], Afnog <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the
>  misappropriation of  IPv4 resources
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> In message <[email protected]>, 
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >@Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again 
> >yesterday
> >night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into
> >our attention and YES - we "will" or "have"
> >to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure
> >that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be.
>
> Thank you for yor support.
>
> I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry
> about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region.
> But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking,
> the least of it all.
>
> Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was
> going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes,
> back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret
> out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and
> beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to
> light last year (2019).  Eddy even said that technical personnel and
> representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being
> brought in to help with this effort.
>
> That was many MANY months ago now.  (Also, as I'm sure many of you know,
> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and
> management for over an entire calendar year now.)
>
> So this raises the obvious question:  Why didn't Eddy and the Board
> already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4
> allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my
> posting the other day about those?  And if they did know, then why did
> they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing
> them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear
> to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked
> transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee
> Ernest Byaruhanga?
>
> It has to be one or the other.  There is no third possibility.
>
> Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent,
> or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all
> AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that
> it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths
> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million
> IPv4 addresses.
>
> I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse.  Either the
> so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else
> Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the
> carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations
> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either
> located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is
> providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region.
>
> I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about
> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and
> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served
> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga.
>
> If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public
> posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for
> them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that
> I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can
> perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records.
>
> On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able
> to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already
> managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then
> I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible
> from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary
> man-on-the-street netizens are privy to.
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
>
> P.S.  I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the
> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters
> under the carpet, as much as possible.  My belief is based on the
> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision...
> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the
> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen,
> to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had
> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to
> protest.
>
> The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only
> partially set right.  The City of Cape Town, the commercial South
> African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil
> company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy
> IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and
> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims.
>
> Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either
> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights,
> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights
> as a matter of expediency.  This is not a shining example of either
> honor or courage on their part.  It is rather a capitulation to criminals,
> and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests
> of the AFRINIC members and community.
>
> Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption.  And frankly,
> I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood
> and appreciated through the African continent.
>
> Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the
> members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen
> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of
> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their
> decisions in an open forum.
>
> The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated
> public scandals in recent years.  Repairing that global reputation cannot
> even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding
> their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected
> Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so
> many years.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:20:49 -0800
> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <[email protected]>
> To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <[email protected]>,
>  [email protected], Afnog <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb,
>  Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc.
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Included below are summraies of the current routing of the various
> AFRINIC-assigned blocks belonging to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC (LiquidWeb, Inc.)
> and also ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC (Fiber Grid, Inc.)  I am providing these to
> the AFRINIC community in support of my prior assertion that no part
> or portion of the AFRINIC-assigned blocks of these two companies are,
> at present, being routed to any country within the AFRINIC region, nor
> to any country or countries that are even adjacent to the AFRINIC region.
>
> The routing summaries below were computed based upon raw data specifying
> the specific ASNs that are routing each of the constituent /24 "C" blocks
> that make up the totality of the registered AFRINIC blocks currently
> assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC respectively.  That
> raw data was obtained by me, programatically, via the "RESTful" web
> interface of the RIPEStat data base.  The raw data from which the
> summaries below were computed may obtained via the following two links,
> or alternatively, directly fronm RIEPStat, for the benefit of anyone
> wishing to independently confirm my analysis.
>
> ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC:
> https://pastebin.com/raw/rzWSckCs
>
> ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC:
> https://pastebin.com/raw/sgFGNjwH
>
> Additionally, the Perl scripts that I have used to fetch the above raw
> data from RIPEStat, as well as the scripts I have used to compute from
> that raw data the routing summary tables shown below are all availiable
> from me upon request.  I would be more than happy to have others
> independently perform the same routing analysis as I have done with
> respect to the IPv4 space currently assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and
> ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC.
>
> The routing summary tables below each contain four fields as follows:
>
>  1)  Number of constituent /24 "C" blocks routed by the given ASN.
>  2)  The AS number.
>  3)  The applicable two-letter ISO 3166 country code.
>  4)  The full name of the ORGanization to which the ASN is registered.
>
> Note that a good deal of the IPv4 space registered to ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC
> is currently being routed by RIPE-issued ASNs registered to "Inter
> Connects Inc".
>
> Upon information and belief, "Inter Connects Inc" is a Delaware (US)
> corporate entity for which Mr. Deepak Mehta is either a beneficial
> owner or else possibly THE beneficial owner.  Mr. Mehta is of course
> free to dispute this contention, as and when he sees fit.  Please note
> however that an entity calling itself "Inter Connects Inc" is also
> currently represented within the RIPE WHOIS data base where it is
> designated via the handle ORG-DMF2-RIPE and that the RIPE WHOIS
> history of that organization handle indicates that it was previously
> associated with "Deepak Mehta FIE":
>
> https://pastebin.com/raw/wnF8g2gh
>
> Please note that AS393489, which appears in the second table below, is
> officially a bogon (unassigned) AS number at present.  Prior to the
> reclamation of this ASN by ARIN, this specific ASN was assigned to a
> U.S. company named "ADT Systems, Inc." and that company appears to
> still be using AS393489, even though AS393489 is now officially a
> bogon ASN.
>
> Please take note also that the organization to which the RIPE-issued
> AS58110 is registered (IP Volume LTD - UK) may or may not have any
> connection whatsoever to the registrant organization for AS202425
> (IP Volume, Inc. - Seychelles) which has for some time announced a
> route to the stolen AFRINIC legacy block 196.16.0.0/14, said block
> being the rightful property of the South African national government's
> IT arm, "SITA", accoring to all reliable historical evidence.
>
> The country codes listed in the following two summary tables, if accurate,
> support my view that the AFRINIC-assigned IPv4 address blocks of both
> ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC are likely not, at present, being
> routed to any geographical points within the AFRINIC region, thus placing
> both of these AFRINIC member organizations in clear violation of the
> legally binding AFRINIC Bylaws.
>
> This, of course, is in addition to and on top of the fact that both
> organizations appear to have obtained some or all of their AFRINIC-
> assigned IPv4 address space illicitly, most probaby by way of the
> dismissed and disgraced Ernest Byaruhanga.
>
>
> Current routing summary for ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC:
> ---------------------------------------------
>  3795  0       ??  UNROUTED IP SPACE
>  233  58065   UK  Packet Exchange Limited
>  164  41564   UK  Packet Exchange Limited
>  79  57858   US  Inter Connects Inc
>  30  204353  UK  Global Offshore Limited
>  13  63119   US  Inter Connects Inc
>  10  60485   US  Inter Connects Inc
>  8  46805   US  Inter Connects Inc
>  7  48950   UK  Global Colocation Limited
>  6  57972   US  Inter Connects Inc
>  4  37518   SC  Fiber Grid INC
>  2  40676   US  Psychz Networks
>  1  50304   NO  Blix Solutions AS
>
> Current routing summary for ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC:
> ---------------------------------------------
>  280  0       ??  UNROUTED IP SPACE
>  111  12025   US  Iron Mountain Data Center
>  68  3356    US  Level 3 Parent, LLC
>  64  1273    GB  Vodafone Group PLC
>  58  43233   IR  Fara Negar Pardaz Noor Khuzestan Co.JSP
>  49  35554   GB  8K Cloud Ltd
>  48  53271   US  Phenix Cable
>  36  133847  MY  Anpple Tech Enterprise
>  34  7029    US  Windstream Communications LLC
>  26  36290   KN  The Cable of St. Kitts
>  20  32181   US  GigeNET
>  12  13768   CA  Aptum Technologies
>  12  265515  MX  Televera Red S. A. P. I. De C.V.
>  12  14123   US  Midnight Proxies LLC
>  12  397373  US  H4Y Technologies LLC
>  10  36445   CA  Coextro
>  8  62217   GB  VooServers Ltd
>  8  39535   GB  VooServers Ltd
>  8  14935   US  Monticello Networks, Inc.
>  8  18710   US  Gkg.Net, Inc
>  8  40676   US  Psychz Networks
>  7  209181  GB  Zenex 5ive Limited
>  6  49367   IT  Seflow S.N.C. Di Marco Brame' & C.
>  6  17511   JP  OPTAGE Inc.
>  5  56309   TH  Siamdata Communication Co.,ltd.
>  5  6327    CA  Shaw Communications Inc.
>  5  17676   JP  Softbank BB Corp.
>  5  28458   MX  Ientc S De Rl De Cv
>  4  17941   JP  Equinix Jpapan Enterprise K.K.
>  4  13213   GB  UK-2 Limited
>  4  396356  US  Maxihost LLC
>  4  36217   US  NetActuate, Inc
>  4  137199  AU  Emerge Internet Pty Ltd
>  4  397026  US  Wi-Fiber, Inc.
>  4  54133   CA  UnmeteredInternet.com
>  4  395046  US  Sexing Technologies
>  4  202211  ES  Manuel Mariposa Consulting SL
>  3  174     US  Cogent Communications
>  3  7018    US  AT&T Services, Inc.
>  3  32780   US  Hosting Services, Inc.
>  2  262239  BZ  Speednet Communications Limited
>  2  398252  US  Big Red Communications LLC
>  2  393670  US  Southern Fibernet Corporation
>  2  63073   US  The University of Tampa
>  2  36351   US  SoftLayer Technologies Inc.
>  2  393489  ??  {{unknown organization}}
>  2  397582  US  WOW-World of Wireless
>  2  62904   US  Eonix Corporation
>  2  26341   US  Open Solutions LLC
>  2  25645   US  Momentum Telecom, Inc.
>  2  63018   US  Dedicated.com
>  2  46562   US  Performive LLC
>  2  397336  US  Virtual Sprout
>  2  23005   US  Switch, Ltd
>  2  54900   US  Alianza Inc.
>  1  28317   CR  Boomerang Wireless S.A.
>  1  133120  AU  Hosted Network Pty. Ltd.
>  1  60781   NL  LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V.
>  1  52356   CR  R&H International Telecom Services SA.
>  1  396459  US  County of Venango
>  1  27362   US  Archon Development Corp.
>  1  26375   US  Airespring, Inc.
>  1  54578   US  FiberComm LC
>  1  131455  AU  Onsite Computers
>  1  59955   LB  Advanced Broadband Services S.A.L
>  1  60257   GB  Origin Broadband Limited
>  1  141158  MY  Hiero7 (M) Sdn. Bhd.
>  1  397256  US  Epyon Technologies
>  1  58110   UK  IP Volume LTD
>  1  20473   US  Choopa, LLC
>  1  14333   US  On-Ramp Indiana, Inc.
>  1  30277   US  DFW Datacenter
>  1  64286   US  LogicWeb Inc.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:05:27 +0400
> From: AFRINIC Communication <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the
>  misappropriation of IPv4 resources
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset=utf-8
>
> [Version en fran?ais au bas]
>
> Dear AFRINIC Community,
>
> AFRINIC is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks 
> that we need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the 
> established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. 
>
> Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data 
> fully completes the process published at:
>
> https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data
>  
>
> We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet 
> number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable 
> to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. 
>
> We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring 
> clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of 
> Internet number resources.
>
> Regards
>
> Ashil Oogarah
> on behalf of AFRINIC Communications and PR Team
>
> ??????????????????????..
>
> Ch?re Communaut? d'AFRINIC,
>
> AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres juridiques que 
> nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons agir dans ce 
> cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement 
> dommageables. 
>
> L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute personne ayant 
> besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? ?
>
> https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data
>  
>
> Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques 
> Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, nous ne 
> sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce que nous 
> savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. 
>
> Nous esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport 
> d'audit, il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la 
> communaut? concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques 
> internet.
>
> Regards
>
> Ashil Oogarah
> au nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d?AFRINIC
>
>
>> On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In message <[email protected]>, 
>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> @Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again 
>>> yesterday
>>> night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into
>>> our attention and YES - we "will" or "have"
>>> to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure
>>> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for yor support.
>>
>> I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry
>> about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region.
>> But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking,
>> the least of it all.
>>
>> Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was
>> going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes,
>> back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret
>> out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and
>> beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to
>> light last year (2019).  Eddy even said that technical personnel and
>> representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being
>> brought in to help with this effort.
>>
>> That was many MANY months ago now.  (Also, as I'm sure many of you know,
>> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and
>> management for over an entire calendar year now.)
>>
>> So this raises the obvious question:  Why didn't Eddy and the Board
>> already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4
>> allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my
>> posting the other day about those?  And if they did know, then why did
>> they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing
>> them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear
>> to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked
>> transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee
>> Ernest Byaruhanga?
>>
>> It has to be one or the other.  There is no third possibility.
>>
>> Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent,
>> or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all
>> AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that
>> it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths
>> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million
>> IPv4 addresses.
>>
>> I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse.  Either the
>> so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else
>> Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the
>> carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations
>> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either
>> located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is
>> providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region.
>>
>> I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about
>> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and
>> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served
>> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga.
>>
>> If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public
>> posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for
>> them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that
>> I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can
>> perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records.
>>
>> On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able
>> to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already
>> managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then
>> I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible
>> from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary
>> man-on-the-street netizens are privy to.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> rfg
>>
>>
>> P.S.  I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the
>> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters
>> under the carpet, as much as possible.  My belief is based on the
>> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision...
>> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the
>> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen,
>> to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had
>> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to
>> protest.
>>
>> The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only
>> partially set right.  The City of Cape Town, the commercial South
>> African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil
>> company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy
>> IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and
>> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims.
>>
>> Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either
>> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights,
>> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights
>> as a matter of expediency.  This is not a shining example of either
>> honor or courage on their part.  It is rather a capitulation to criminals,
>> and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests
>> of the AFRINIC members and community.
>>
>> Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption.  And frankly,
>> I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood
>> and appreciated through the African continent.
>>
>> Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the
>> members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen
>> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of
>> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their
>> decisions in an open forum.
>>
>> The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated
>> public scandals in recent years.  Repairing that global reputation cannot
>> even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding
>> their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected
>> Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so
>> many years.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> afnog mailing list
>> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:23:22 +0000
> From: yamadu <[email protected]>
> To: AFRINIC Communication <[email protected]>,
>  [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the
>  misappropriation of IPv4 resources
> Message-ID:
>  
> <pa4pr09mb47513e9fafcd3fa0fcbd890e96...@pa4pr09mb4751.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
>  
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> i think we should fellow due processes to address issues as a? community. 
> AFRINIC has policies and legal framework that we are aware, so we should 
> comply with when we want to address any concern. My take.Yusif?Sent from my 
> Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> -------- Original message --------From: AFRINIC Communication 
> <[email protected]> Date: 20/12/2020  8:05 a.m.  (GMT+00:00) To: 
> [email protected] Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] 
> Updates on the misappropriation of
> ? IPv4 resources [Version en fran?ais au bas]Dear AFRINIC Community,AFRINIC 
> is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks that we 
> need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the 
> established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. 
> Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data 
> fully completes the process published 
> at:https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data
>  We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet 
> number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable 
> to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. 
> We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring 
> clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of 
> Internet number resources.RegardsAshil Oogarahon behalf of AFRINIC 
> Communications and PR Team??????????????????????..Ch?re Communaut? 
> d'AFRINIC,AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres 
> juridiques que nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons 
> agir dans ce cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement 
> dommageables. L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute 
> personne ayant besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? 
> ?https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data
>  Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources 
> num?riques Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, 
> nous ne sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce 
> que nous savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. Nous 
> esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport d'audit, 
> il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la communaut? 
> concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques 
> internet.RegardsAshil Oogarahau nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP 
> d?AFRINIC> On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette 
> <[email protected]> wrote:> > In message 
> <[email protected]>, > 
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:> >> @Mr. Ronald I was 
> reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday>> night and 
> this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into>> our 
> attention and YES - we "will" or "have">> to do whatever it's necessary to 
> revert this situation and to ensure>> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it 
> should be.> > Thank you for yor support.> > I suppose that it should be 
> apparent to all that I am upset and angry> about many of the things that have 
> gone on within the AFRINIC region.> But the various IP block thefts 
> themselves are, to my way of thinking,> the least of it all.> > Quite some 
> time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was> going to be 
> performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes,> back to the 
> beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret> out any -more- 
> instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and> beyond those that I 
> and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to> light last year (2019).? 
> Eddy even said that technical personnel and> representatives of one of the 
> more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being> brought in to help with this effort.> > 
> That was many MANY months ago now.? (Also, as I'm sure many of you know,> 
> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and> 
> management for over an entire calendar year now.)> > So this raises the 
> obvious question:? Why didn't Eddy and the Board> already know about the 
> apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4> allocations held by Mr. 
> Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my> posting the other day about 
> those?? And if they did know, then why did> they elect to give both Mr. 
> Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing> them both to *keep* the sizable 
> AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear> to have been provided to them... 
> presumably in fundamentally crooked> transactions... by the now disgraced and 
> long ago terminated ex-employee> Ernest Byaruhanga?> > It has to be one or 
> the other.? There is no third possibility.> > Either Eddy & the Board knew, 
> and elected to do nothing and keep silent,> or else their much heralded 
> "exhaustive audit" of the history of all> AFRINIC allocations was so 
> fundementally flawed and incomplete that> it failed to catch obviously 
> questionable allocations of great swaths> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address 
> space, totaling well over a million> IPv4 addresses.> > I'm not sure which of 
> these two possibilities is worse.? Either the> so-called "audit" was done in 
> a glaringly incompetent manner, or else> Eddy and the Board have been 
> complicit in trying to sweep under the> carpet the questionable nature of the 
> sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. 
> Mehta... neither of whom is either> located in the AFRINIC region, and 
> neither of whom, it appears, is> providing -any- services whatsoever within 
> the AFRINIC region.> > I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when 
> they learned about> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. 
> Abizeid and> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for 
> years served> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga.> > If Eddy 
> and the Board only learned about those connections from my public> posting of 
> a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for> them to grant 
> me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that> I have been 
> repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can> perform a 
> proper sort of audit and analysis of those records.> > On the other hand, if 
> they are none too pleased with me having been able> to find and expose the 
> many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already> managed to find and 
> expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then> I guess they will 
> continue to want to keep me as far away as possible> from any historical 
> WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary> man-on-the-street 
> netizens are privy to.> > > Regards,> rfg> > > P.S.? I am more than a little 
> inclined to believe that Eddy and the> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have 
> wanted to just sweep these matters> under the carpet, as much as possible.? 
> My belief is based on the> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made 
> a decision...> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing 
> the> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen,> to 
> keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had> 
> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to> 
> protest.> > The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only> 
> partially set right.? The City of Cape Town, the commercial South> African 
> firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil> company, Sasol, 
> and others have all managed to get their legacy> IPv4 blocks back from the 
> clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up 
> to assert their rightful claims.> > Other legitimate legacy block holders 
> have, unfortunately, been either> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to 
> even assert their rights,> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply 
> ignore those rights> as a matter of expediency.? This is not a shining 
> example of either> honor or courage on their part.? It is rather a 
> capitulation to criminals,> and an abdication of their responsibilities to 
> act in the best interests> of the AFRINIC members and community.> > Giving in 
> to corruption only leads to even more corruption.? And frankly,> I remain 
> surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood> and 
> appreciated through the African continent.> > Eddy and the Board can and 
> should stop their silent charade, tell the> members what they have decided to 
> do, or not do, about the various stolen> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this 
> day remain stolen and in the hands of> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they 
> should be prepared to defend their> decisions in an open forum.> > The global 
> reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated> public scandals 
> in recent years.? Repairing that global reputation cannot> even begin as long 
> as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding> their decision making 
> process behind the same closed doors that protected> Ernest Byaruhanga and 
> his criminal machinations from public view for so> many years.> > 
> _______________________________________________> afnog mailing list> 
> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog_______________________________________________Community-Discuss
>  mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20201220/63e207e0/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Community-Discuss Digest, Vol 698, Issue 1
> *************************************************
>

_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to