On 31 Jul 2021, at 22:02, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jul 31, 2021, at 03:58 , Nishal Goburdhan
<[email protected]> wrote:
So your claim is
[i usually don’t post here, but i’d like to clear up one thing]:
no owen. that is not my claim. what i said (which you inadvertently
seemed to have snipped) was that this is a possible interpretation, and
:
“.. for the record, i don’t pretend that *my* interpretation is
correct. but merely that the order was easy to misinterpret, “
Sure, there’s probably room for clever attorneys to engage in some
level of sophistry around this,
one might also argue that this clever sophistry is exactly the premise
of the CI vs. afrinic case.
IANAL, so,
# i don’t pretend to ascribe to this level of sophistry, and
# i have no interest in discussing your case
-n.
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
