Hi Noah , 

I am not sure if maybe we are using the same dictionary for “building” , well 
otherwise it seems like you are using a different one, surely it extends 
destruction, instead of construction . Your obsession with LARUS makes you 
argue everyone whom you believe is associate with LARUS, I mean it surely 
pushes you to even overlook the most important matters at hands . You don’t 
seem care much about the improvement and communication of AFRICA . Well if that 
was the case you’d be obsessed with what is best for African communication 
infrastructure, instead of always looking for someone to build your argument 
around . I am convinced you really don’t care about this community , just even 
the future of AFRICAN communication.

Regards,
Thizwilondi  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 02 Aug 2021, at 20:40, Noah <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Oga Antony,
> 
> To be honest, I am obsessed with building real networks and systems on the 
> AFRICAN soil because I know the impact that such communication infrastructure 
> have on our people and the digital transformation of Africa. That is my 
> obsessions.
> 
> Producing evidence here is immaterial, as such, I shall keep the evidence so 
> tight for presentation before the Hon.Judge in chamber in defence of my 
> claims.
> 
> Remember, I will then need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what I 
> stated was based on factual evidence and with (remote) witnesses. 
> 
> Its not wise for a soon-to-be defendant to share evidence with a potential 
> plaintiff.
> 
> That is how we shall role.....
> 
> Cheers
> Noah
> 
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:44 PM Anthony Ubah <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello Noah,
>> 
>> I demand you produce this email, and all evidence surrounding this claim.
>> Your obsession has really come to the edge at this time.
>> You delusion of grandeur constantly pushes you towards aggression and 
>> personal attacks while responding to 'every single post' on every 
>> mailinglist. Please note that libel has consequences.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Anthony
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021, 2:25 AM Noah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, 08:53 Brian Sowers, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> The transfer policy makes sense.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Not the Larus sponsored RTP which is under PDWG appeal. We got an email 
>>> from a reliable source about the genesis of the Antony/Taiwo resource 
>>> transfer policy so I know the motive which is now more clear in light of 
>>> recent events.
>>> 
>>>> Ratify the existing consensus Resource Transfer Policy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I refer you to the below PDWG dispute. 
>>> 
>>> The submitted appeals against that resource transfer proposal remain open 
>>> pending determination by an Appeal Committee.
>>> 
>>> https://afrinic.net/policy/appeal-committee?lang=en#appeals
>>> 
>>> 1st pending appeal against DPP AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer 
>>> Policy)
>>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeal-consensus-ressource-transfer-policy-updated-20102020.pdf
>>> 
>>> 2nd pending appeal against DPP AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer 
>>> Policy)
>>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/afrinic-appeal-resource-transfer-policy.pdf
>>> 
>>> The PDP process was not followed and I welcome you to review both appeal 
>>> documents.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Noah
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to