I find this quite offensive given I was just stating an opinion. I also believe the manner which are are carrying on in is against the code of conduct, there was a more mature and respectful way to reply to what I said.
Cheken On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, 21:01 Ronald F. Guilmette, <[email protected]> wrote: > In message < > camod5rqd2kgbhotuh7xqtya_mmu9sbmcrzjokqtyjpb_uws...@mail.gmail.com> > Cheken Chetty <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I believe this to be a bit distasteful, in my opinion Lu doesn't need to > >respond to such statements just by pure affiliation. There is also the > fact > >that these are mere statements lacking evidence. It could be an attempt to > >create tension and show the Number Resource Society in a bad light. Even > me > >as an individual has seen that the NRS protects the interests of resource > >members. All in all, I believe that Lu doesn't need to concern himself > with > >this. > > Yet another anonymous gmail sock puppet, spewing the Lu Heng party line. > > Swell. Just what we needed. > > Go away now Mr. Cheken Chetty. Please crawl back into whatever hole Lu > Heng > conjured you out of. Nobody is impressed. > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
