In message <CAF4kYptg1rr5C2s4hC_=65EfBFUXUmWHQ90Nk+5gzcuh=07...@mail.gmail.com> Paul Hjul <[email protected]> wrote:
>As a >result of these steps it was reliably indicated to me that at least one >litigating party had decided to again present court sanctioned mediation as >something they were willing to engage in. Predictably as soon as the >suggestion of the opportunity to get the organization functioning in a >proper and rule driven manner was made a predictable chorus of individuals >who try to control the organization and who patently would rather see >Afrinic destroyed than not under their control piped up. I suggeted mediation on this list as a possible solution ahwile ago. Now I wish that I had not done so. It is a Bad Idea. It would just be a way for some people to obtain, as we say here "half a loaf" when IN FAIRNESS they deserve nothing at all. Regards, rfg P.S. I have no vested interests in who runs AFRINIC. It doesn't matter to me *financially* at all. As a matter of general principal however I believe that AFRINIC should be run by a cooperating group of Africans, and not by some single Chinese guy who clearly has more money (and more lawyers) than he has either brains or ethics or transparency. _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
