"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 27/10/2002 12:20:26 AM:
> Mr Ship, > > I totally disagree with Pier's statement (and you'll find many here will > feel the same as I on this). > The opinion of Tapestry joining is very good. > Realize Apache is more like a confederation than anything. So different > people feel > differently. We're still ironing out a new process as Pier said, > however most folks I've > spoken to have felt that the Apache voting rules must be adopted as a > first step not > later. Dion and I have both committed to helping you with this > transition (though I don't > think he ever stated so publically...Dion?). And I'll be happy to This counts as publicly volunteering :) > subscribe to the tapestry > list if you desire and help you build the structure. > > The steps as I see them: > > 1. Adopt apache voting rules > 2. Vote to join and relicense (in one swoop) > 3. Submit a formal proposal 3a. PMC confers > 4. You're in [snip] > Me & Dion > 1. Find a sponsoring member > 2. Assist you in reorganizing > 3. Assist you in your propoasal > 4. Make our case > 5. Assist you in getting your sources/structures here. 6. Assist in liaising with incubator 7. Assist in 'The Apache Way' details. > Thats as clearly as i can lay it out. Hopefully others will chime in > constructively and clear up anything I got wrong or is fuzzy ;-) -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
