On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 09:38, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: 
> Three views exist presently on this list's "openness".  The purpose of 
> this list is to fascillitate community development among the various 
> disconneted groups in Apache.  Then to further discuss issues that 
> affect the community as a whole.
> 
> View 1: Open the list completely, anyone can subscribe, post and read 
> the archive
> View 2:  Keep the list open only to committers, members and invitees 
> (highly contributive developers and users) so far as posting goes, 
> however allow anyone to read or view the archive (and include an archive 
> such as MARC, etc.
> View 3: Close the list to all except members and committers.
> 
> View 1: +1 Sam, Steven Noles
> View 2: +1 Andy

+1 

I see no reason to not have an open archive, but am fine with the list
being restricted, with exceptions on a case by case basis (although for
every exception I'm inclined to ask, so why isn't this valuable
contributor a committer? Oh yes, that can of worms again...) 

> View 3: +1 Ken
> 
> Andy:
> I'd like to protect the list from random posters.  If a user or someone 
> wants to get in, then fine let them in if they have something to 
> contribute, but this will prevent someone posting a random "Gee how do I 
> use tomcat" or "here is what you should do but I have never and will 
> never contribute to apache in any realy sense of the word" posts that 
> often degrade the quality of the list.  This will also help prevent a 
> personal experience of mine from repeating itself when I first tried to 
> get involved, where I posted a simple question and got flamed without 
> ever knowing the context rhyme or reasons...
> 
> Please state your view and vote your conscience.
> 
> -Andy
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to