> From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 20:36
>> Aaron Bannert wrote:
>>
>> The problem with nominations in a forum that does
>> not perfectly match the voting body is that it makes it
>> difficult to hold discussions about the nominee in a fair way.
>> Nominations, IMNSHO, belong on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I can't speak for Ted, but I don't mind, fire away.
> I'm pretty thick-skinned, and I'm curious to see what
> goes into the evaluation process. If you're really
> concerned about keeping your opinion on me private,
> you can post it to members instead, but I assure you
> that I'm OK with criticism.
>
> In fact, I'd rather be turned down in public and know
> why then get turned down "in absentia". :)
It is not only for the nominee but also for the voting body.
When someone other than a fellow voter is looking at you
expectantly, people tend to act differently. [Try stuffing
a camera in someones face and see if you can spot behaviour
changes.]
In a sense this is influencing the voting body, whether positive
or negative doesn't matter, it's inappropiate IMO.
Sander 'who fears he has to wear his asbestos suite for a while
longer' Striker
