+1 for open read and write. Sanjiva.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:19 PM Subject: [VOTE] Openness > Please, allow me to restart the voting in order to make it easier to > reach some consensus since it's hard to interpret the results of the > previous one. > > - o - > > There are two different concerns for openness: > > - open to read > > - open to write > > Let's try to keep them separate. > > NOTE: there is no need to indicate the reasons for your votes, either > for negative ones. > > Also, please, don't vote 0.5 or other numbers, let's keep it simple for > the final count. > > - o - > > > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read > this mail list thru a web archive? > > [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > > > - o - > > > VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully > subscribe to this mail list? > > [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only > > > - o - > > Please, place your vote even if you already voted in the previous poll. > > We'll reset the clock and give 78 hours for the vote. > > I volunteer to count the retults and post them here. > > Thanks in advance and sorry for the double poll noise. > > -- > Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
