Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to > read this mail list thru a web archive? > > [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [X] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > > VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to > fully subscribe to this mail list? > > [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only > > and invitees (contributors). > > While every list is its own community, this "community" is supposed to > be a subset of a bigger community, and I think having it restricted to > people involved in the community helps accomplish that. If > "committers" is too narrow a set, then it can be opened up to > something wider but still less than "anyone". Restricting it after > the fact seems like an ugly game. > > The point is you can't join the community by joining "community", you > have to be part of the community to join "community".
My sentiments exactly. +1 -- Joe Schaefer
