From: "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> James Strachan wrote:
> > From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>In the case of Maven, it would seem to me that a <bio/> or
<homepage/>
> >>>>>element inside <developer/> elements in project.xml files would be
most
> >>>>>appropriate.
> >>>>
> >>>>Working on adding <url/> element as we speak.
> >>>
> >>>Gah; bike shedding at work!  Just having each project (and the
> >>>member list) keep it updated via their own pages seems much simpler
> >>>and in a very simple way it makes it clear that the committer did an
> >>>opt-in.
> >>
> >>Actually, I don't believe so.  The proposed <url/> element will
> >>presumably be added to the input source from which the Maven Project
> >>Team page is generated.  It will still be up to the individual to
> >>explicitly provide it, and will be monitored and maintained by the
> >
> > project.
> >
> >>After that point, one of us will screen scrape it.  ;-)
> >
> >
> > You won't need to screen scrape. You could use XPath / XSLT...
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-turbine-maven/project.xml?rev=HEAD
> >
> > search for //developer
> >
> > Looks like there'll be a new <homepage> element in there soon too...
>
> Doesn't this lead to loads of duplication of developer info? Surely they
> need to be included by reference?

Agreed. Thats why I was arguing for a single canonical place (a single
developer.xml file available on the web) where all Apache committer info can
be put and then reused on each project.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

Reply via email to