> From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:27 PM
> Ben Hyde said: > > Didn't we settle this most contentious issue some time ago with a few > > megabytes of text and a long complex vote coupled with a solid turn > > out? If so it's painful and cruel to reopen the issue. - ben > > I've already apologized twice for rehashing an old issue, but that is > obviously a penalty a list must pay if it has no archives. There's always the ezmlm get syntax which allows you to get to the messages. I'll agree if you think it is a horrible interface ;) > I will reiterate my arguments, then I'll go away for to save you all the > pain of my opinions: > > 1. The list is, at minimum, terribly misnamed. Yes. It has been a misnomer from the start. Sander --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
