On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Sam Ruby wrote: > In two weeks, there is a board meeting. At that time, I would like to > be able to report that the contents of the Maven repository conforms to > the policies of the Apache Software Foundation. > > Code under the ASF License is clearly OK. As is the IBM Public License > (the pre-Jakarta BSF, for example) and the MPL (Rhino). The following > public domain components are also approved: Antlr and Doug Lea's > concurrency package. > > Licenses clearly not conforming to the ASF's policies for distribution: > LGPL, GPL, Sun's Binary Code License.
If possible: we need a review on the JMX1.2 RI license. My understanding is that it allows redistribution ( JMX1.1 was more restrictive ) and it doesn't seem to require "click" or other things. No other JMX1.2 implementation exists at this moment and we need some of the security enhancements. Tomcat5 relies on JMX. I consider this critical. Costin > > Please direct any questions or comments (including new licenses to be > considered) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some we can resolve for > ourselves (e.g., the specific public domain packages above). Others > I'll batch up and forward to the board and/or licensing folk. > > By the board meeting after that (3rd week in March), I'd like to have > the infrastructure issues resolved (where should this data should be > hosted, mirrored, etc). > > - Sam Ruby > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
