On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Seeing the interest it has raised, I tend to think think it's time to > get the act together and start working on it. I'd like to propose this > for incubation ASAP, so to not loose momentum. > ... > > Codebases or part of codebases that could convole in the effort: > > ...
I don't think the main issue is codebases. What we need is a minimal common ground on naming conventions for the repository ( so projects can get in sync with the repository ), and an agreement on a metadata format ( descriptors for dependencies and versions and so on ). I think discussion on codebase will just create a mess. The goal is to have a jar repository and get some consistency among our projects. If we have a layout and metadata we agree on - any tool could work. If it is an ant task or a perl program or we just rsync - it doesn't matter. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
