Craig, > If we make the two choices (which version and which local name) > independent request parameters, we've covered all the > combinations and permuations.
The idea I had was for the request URI to be project based. The response to that stable URI would be descriptor content. Part of the descriptor content would provide version and package naming information (I expect that this would all be XML-based, but it just needs to be some standard format). With a static content server, the client parses the response, locates the desired version, pulls out the necessary download URI. The mapping from package and version strings is not required to be encoded within the download URI. ref: http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&m sgNo=1781 --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
