Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 05:09:50 AM: > A somewhat standard layout is the important part. > > If we are changing current practice I think > > project/[subproject]/version/(jar|zip|gz|docs|liscenses) > is very good.
Sub project is, IMHO, way too fragile to be part of the URI. This is why we left it out of maven. Same for cvs name. Projects often move 'up' and change their cvs repo. > All kinds of artifacts for a particular version in one dir. Seems the > easiest to me. My personal preference is to have the version in the artifact name for use later on. This is, I know, an unpopular view, but one that has saved many people time in the long run. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
