At 09:12 AM 10/22/2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: >On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:31:20 -0000 >(Subject: RE: The board is not responsible!) >Magnus ?or Torfason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > Isn't the ASF Board ultimately responsible >> > This is just wrong. Responsibility lies with the individual >> > commiters, members, and their associated project PMCs. >> But this seems to have been exactly the problem with the recent >> discussions. The arguments have been over the use of the >> announce@apache.org mailing list, and there seems to be no PMC >> responsible for that list. > >* Fund-raising (Board Committee) >* Security Team (Board Committee) >* Infrastructure or Operations team (Presidents Committee) > >These three do not have PMC entities in the strict sense of the word.
These are (non-project) management committees. They are empowered to make certain decisions and are accountable to the membership as a whole through the board and president, respectively. The two board ones answer to the board, infrastructure answers to the president. If their was a public relations or communications committee, the newsletter would obviously fit right there. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
