The Calypso chip in GTM900 is D751949ZHH, which is also HERCROM400 series.
The FCDEV3B chip is marked as PD75xx, do we know what is the difference
between that and D75xx ?

-Serg

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:37 PM Mychaela Falconia <
mychaela.falco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello FreeCalypso community,
>
> Last week I received a few GTM900 modules from Songbosi, and yesterday
> I finally got around to powering one of them up using the included FPC
> breakout board.  Both Calypso UARTs are indeed brought out on this
> module, and both of them work.  The original firmware presents an AT
> command interface on the MODEM UART and TI's RVTMUX interface on the
> IrDA UART just like mainline TI/FreeCalypso firmwares; Huawei's
> version of the RVTMUX interface features the same level of trace
> verbosity as our TCS211 reference version and supports ETM commands
> for reading and writing memory and registers, i.e., fc-tmsh works just
> fine against Huawei's fw.
>
> The current version of fc-loadtool in the freecalypso-tools repository
> now supports flash operations on these GTM900 modules.  The new target
> is -h gtm900, telling the Calypso boot ROM to run the ARM7 core at
> 52 MHz and sensibly configuring MEMIF registers, whereas newly added
> support for the flash part of the K5L3316CAM MCP (the combined
> flash+RAM chip used in these modules) resides in the fc-loadtool
> binary itself.  The new flash handling architecture in fc-loadtool as
> of two weeks ago is based on a hard-coded table of all supported flash
> chip types, designed to grow easily as new devices are found, plus an
> autodetection mechanism that selects among these supported flash chip
> types based on the ID codes read from the chip.
>
> The next step for me is to put out a new release of FC host tools.  I
> still need to finish documenting some of my earlier changes (in
> particular the documentation for the target-utils suite needs to be
> finished), and when I am done with this documentation work and maybe a
> few more minor code changes, we'll have the release.
>
> After we get the next FC host tools release out that includes GTM900
> support and other recent developments (the most interesting is the
> manipulation of the undocumented register in the Iota ABB to fix the
> erratic behaviour seen in the test reset, then poweroff, then PWON
> sequence - see Calypso-test-reset article in freecalypso-docs), before
> I go to the next step of adding GTM900 target support to our Magnetite
> and Selenite firmwares, there will be an intermediate step of producing
> a better breakout board for these GTM900 modem modules.
>
> The way I see it, the motivation behind providing full FC support for
> these GTM900 modems is to allow these very cheap modules to serve as
> a much cheaper alternative to our expensive FCDEV3B, making our
> FreeCalypso sw/fw offerings accessible to those who cannot afford our
> high-end hardware.  To make such usage possible, we need a better
> breakout board for these FPC-interfaced modems - not just a dumb
> breakout board that turns every FPC pin into a 2.54 mm pin 1:1, but a
> more purpose-made one.  My idea to build a breakout or interface board
> that will have the SIM socket, PWON and RESET pushbuttons on the board
> itself and provide the same connectors for power and for the dual UART
> as on the FCDEV3B.  I plan on working on this breakout or interface
> board design after the FC host tools release.
>
> Hasta la Victoria, Siempre,
> Mychaela aka The Mother
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community@freecalypso.org
> https://www.freecalypso.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
Community@freecalypso.org
https://www.freecalypso.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Reply via email to