It is "the" reference implementation of the geo interface, but only one implementation of GeoJSON. I could live with PyGeoJSON, but would it be as fun as "Pygeon" or "GeoSON"?
Eric Lemoine wrote: > Ref as reference implementation? Is this project really the GeoJSON > reference impl (open question)? If not i think i'd like PyGeoJSON > better. My two cents. Eric > > 2008/4/28, Sean Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi all, >> >> I think the "geojson" package name is fine, but we'd invite less >> confusion with the GeoJSON format specification effort and the spec >> document itself if we changed our project name to something like >> "GeoJSONRef". Thoughts? >> >> Sean _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
