Wow, this looks really nice. I should have time to test it either
later tonight or tomorrow. It's also interesting that this should
allow an easy transition if/when they move to a thread safe only
interface.

Thanks,
Aron

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Sean Gillies <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aron,
>
> I did a bit of work along those lines and made some pretty good
> progress. Tests are passing except for a couple I had to disable.
> Updating of coordinate sequences through geos_linestring and
> geos_linearring is currently broken. I'm not sure whether it's my
> fault or a bug in the reentrant API. Probably the former.
>
> Checkout r1194 if you're interested in testing. I haven't tried it in
> a threaded situation yet, and suspect it will be pretty hard to
> trigger a fault -- Shapely itself doesn't expose any means of
> modifying the GEOS context data, and I don't see it being done inside
> GEOS.
>
> Cheers,
> Sean
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Aron Bierbaum wrote:
>
>> This is a really long shot but what do people think of something like
>> the following. I have run into a few problems with ctypes while trying
>> to run with it, but I thought it might start people thinking.
>>
>> import threading
>> import functools
>>
>> class LocalStorage(threading.local):
>>   def __getattr__(self, name):
>>      if "handle" == name:
>>         self.handle = geos_lib.initGEOS_r(notice_h, error_h)
>>         #print "Construct handle:", threading.currentThread().name
>>         #print "              id:", id(self.handle)
>>         return self.handle
>>      raise AttributeError("Local storage does not have attribute
>> '%s'" % name)
>>
>> local_storage = LocalStorage()
>>
>> class ThreadSafeGeos(object):
>>   def __getattr__(self, name):
>>      new_name = "%s_r" % (name)
>>      r_func = getattr(geos_lib, new_name)
>>      handle = local_storage.handle
>>      return functools.partial(r_func, handle)
>>
>> tsgeos = ThreadSafeGeos()
>>
>> lgeos = tsgeos
>>
>>
>> -Aron
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Justin Bronn <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Aron Bierbaum wrote:
>>>> The only idea that I have off the top of my head is to use
>>>> threading.local in order to keep track of a handle for each thread
>>>> that calls any function in GEOS. I tried implementing something like
>>>> this quickly and ran into problems. Any other ideas?
>>>
>>> Since I'm going to have to do the same for GeoDjango's bindings, I've
>>> been kicking around some ideas on how to do this -- and I also
>>> thought
>>> of something similar.  I think this idea would work, but it's going
>>> to
>>> require some extensive implementation.
>>>
>>> Basically you'd have a global dict keyed by threading.currentThread()
>>> and a corresponding value be the GEOS context handle.  However, you'd
>>> have to (have a way to determine whether you're running GEOS 3.1 or
>>> not
>>> and use the appropriate threading/non-threading function signature --
>>> including dynamically insert the context handle into the GEOS C API
>>> function arguments.  I'm wondering how much overhead this is and what
>>> the effect on performance would be -- but I haven't had time (and
>>> won't
>>> for the next several weeks) to mock up and try it out.
>>>
>>>>> Thread safety hasn't been a problem up to now, and we've hammered
>>>>> on
>>>>> it quite a bit. We're using PyDLL to load libgeos_c, which means
>>>>> the
>>>>> GIL isn't released.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's a problem that's not seen until two routines enter the
>>> same
>>> critical areas in GEOS at the same time.  For web apps the problem
>>> (segfaulting Apache/FCGI processes) becomes more apparent as traffic
>>> increases for the site.  I consider it a serious problem.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Reply via email to