> -----Original Message----- > From: Dominic Lowe [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 11:06 > To: Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] > Cc: gispython.org community projects > Subject: Re: [Community] New OWSLib interfaces test > > Hi Tom, > > Sorry for the delay in replying. > > > I've changed the output model for query responses to be > dictionaries. > > Check out http://trac.gispython.org/lab/changeset/1464 and > let me know > > if this makes sense. > > > > Looks good. I haven't tried it out yet but will do when I get > a chance. > > On Wednesday 07 October 2009 19:58:24 Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] wrote: > > > Maybe for now we should put SOS into an "owslib.experimental" > > > package along with WFS 2.0? That way they don't hold us back from > > > making a new release (they could still be in the release > but in the > > > 'experimental' package.) > > > > Is this blocking a release? If yes, I would suppport this. > If there > > are other issues, I may have some time in the next couple > of weeks to > > lock down SOS support. > > > I'm not going to be able to do anything on it for a couple of > weeks anyway, but it would be quite nice to get a new release > out soon. There have been a lot of fixes and developments so > the 3.1 easy install is now a bit out of date. > > So basically I think if you do get a chance to work on SOS > soon then we should keep it in, if not, then we should move it. >
I've been bogged down in the last week or so, so I would say +1 to moving WFS 2.0 and SOS 1.0.0 to an experimental release when we cut a new release. > I think I will move the WFS 2.0 stuff to an experimental > branch anyway. > > Cheers > Dom > _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
